Last week, the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) sent a letter to leaders in Congress, urging the passage of legislation that would prohibit mandatory arbitration of workplace sexual harassment claims. In the letter, 56 attorneys general of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the Virgin Islands called on Congress to allow victims of workplace sexual harassment claims to have their days in court and be afforded the “procedural and substantive due process” that comes with proceeding with a lawsuit.  

The attorneys general agreed that mandatory arbitration may be beneficial “in other contexts,” but concluded decisively that those benefits “do not extend to sexual harassment claims.” They also frowned upon clauses that require confidentiality of complaints and settlements of such claims because they prevent the “me too” moments in which similarly situated victims may learn of harassment claims of others and decide whether they, too, might pursue relief.

The letter suggests that the House of Representatives and the Senate are considering legislation to address these issues. One bill, entitled the “Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Harassment Act” was introduced by a bipartisan group of senators in December 2017, and two House versions have since been introduced, although none of them address confidentiality clauses. In March of 2017, Senator Richard Blumenthal, the former Attorney General for Connecticut, along with several other democratic co-sponsors introduced to the Senate the “Mandatory Arbitration Transparency Act,” which would have curtailed the use of confidentiality clauses for arbitrable civil rights, consumer, employment disputes. That bill did not proceed to a vote.

Whether or not Congress will agree to ban predispute arbitration agreements for sexual harassment cases remains to be seen given courts’ willingness to enforce such agreements in the last 20 years.

The Labor and Employment Practice Group at Murtha Cullina LLP will be following any proposed legislation closely.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Salvatore G. Gangemi Salvatore G. Gangemi

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction…

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction, retail and service firms; and emerging companies, seek Sal’s legal counsel to navigate today’s complex local, state and federal employment laws. His practice includes resolving disputes; advocating in courts and before administrative agencies; counseling on employment-related issues arising from acquisitions; and guiding clients in both long-range strategy and day-to-day administration of their workplaces and employees.

At the federal level, Sal brings extensive experience in OSHA investigations, audits and proceedings; the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); Title VII discrimination matters; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). He is also well-versed in state and local employment regulations.

Sal regularly represents clients in matters before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Department of Labor and other federal agencies. On the state level, he appears before the New York State Division of Human Rights; the New York City Commission on Human Rights; the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities; the Connecticut Department of Labor; and the New York State Department of Labor. He has litigated cases involving misappropriation of trade secrets, restrictive covenants, breach of employment contract, fiduciary duty and other work-related common law claims.

Clients rely on Sal’s advice on routine human resources matters that arise in their businesses, including requests for reasonable accommodation for those with disabilities, family and medical leave issues, hiring and termination, and wage and hour concerns. Known for his proactive approach to identifying issues before they escalate, he conducts compliance training on sexual harassment prevention and other topics, performs worker classification practice and policy audits, and drafts employment policies and agreements. Sal shares his knowledge of the ever-evolving employment law landscape by speaking at events, conducting continuing legal education seminars and writing articles for a variety of publications.