A new Massachusetts law significantly enhances existing anti-discrimination protections for pregnant employees. The “Massachusetts Pregnant Workers Fairness Act,” effective April 1, 2018, prevents discrimination against, and expressly protects, employees who are pregnant or are experiencing pre- and post-birth pregnancy-related medical needs, including, but not limited to, lactation, expressing breast milk, and recovering from childbirth.

This new law supplements several existing state and federal law protections for pregnant employees. Existing state-law includes parental leave requirements in chapter 149 of the Massachusetts General Laws, and existing federal protections exist in Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and lactation break and location accommodation requirements passed as part of the Affordable Care Act but applicable only to employees who are not exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act obligates employers to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnancy or conditions relating to pregnancy, which may include:

  • more frequent or longer paid or unpaid breaks;
  • time off to attend to a pregnancy complication or recover from childbirth with or without pay;
  • acquisition or modification of equipment or seating;
  • temporary transfer to a less strenuous or hazardous position;
  • job restructuring;
  • light duty;
  • private non-bathroom space for expressing breast milk;
  • assistance with manual labor; or
  • a modified work schedule.

Employers must engage in a timely, good faith, and interactive process to determine an effective, reasonable accommodation for an employee to perform the essential functions of the job.

Interestingly, the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act explicitly prohibits an employer from requesting medical documentation justifying the accommodations of:

  • more frequent restroom, food or water breaks;
  • acquisition or modification of seating;
  • limits on lifting more than 20 pounds; and
  • private non-bathroom space for expressing breast milk.

The Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination has already issued Guidance and Q&As relating to the law which, in addition to those conditions listed in the statute itself, identifies morning sickness as a pregnancy-related medical need that may require a reasonable accommodation of a later starting time.

Employers subject to Chapter 151B have an obligation to provide eligible employees with written notice of their rights under this new law. That notice must be “distributed” to all employees, provided to all new employees at or prior to employment, and given within 10 days to any employee who notifies the employer of a pregnancy or a condition relating to pregnancy.

With the law now in full force, employers should immediately review their handbooks and policies to ensure that they are in compliance with this new law, including by training staff about how to respond to inquiries from eligible employees. Employers with facilities in more than one state should take care to comply with all states’ requirements, which can differ in important ways.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Salvatore G. Gangemi Salvatore G. Gangemi

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction…

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction, retail and service firms; and emerging companies, seek Sal’s legal counsel to navigate today’s complex local, state and federal employment laws. His practice includes resolving disputes; advocating in courts and before administrative agencies; counseling on employment-related issues arising from acquisitions; and guiding clients in both long-range strategy and day-to-day administration of their workplaces and employees.

At the federal level, Sal brings extensive experience in OSHA investigations, audits and proceedings; the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); Title VII discrimination matters; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). He is also well-versed in state and local employment regulations.

Sal regularly represents clients in matters before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Department of Labor and other federal agencies. On the state level, he appears before the New York State Division of Human Rights; the New York City Commission on Human Rights; the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities; the Connecticut Department of Labor; and the New York State Department of Labor. He has litigated cases involving misappropriation of trade secrets, restrictive covenants, breach of employment contract, fiduciary duty and other work-related common law claims.

Clients rely on Sal’s advice on routine human resources matters that arise in their businesses, including requests for reasonable accommodation for those with disabilities, family and medical leave issues, hiring and termination, and wage and hour concerns. Known for his proactive approach to identifying issues before they escalate, he conducts compliance training on sexual harassment prevention and other topics, performs worker classification practice and policy audits, and drafts employment policies and agreements. Sal shares his knowledge of the ever-evolving employment law landscape by speaking at events, conducting continuing legal education seminars and writing articles for a variety of publications.