On September 30, 2020, section 196-b of the New York State Labor Law went into effect.  The legislation, which provides for the immediate accrual of employer-provided sick leave, permits sick leave to be taken beginning on January 1, 2021.  We wrote about the New York State Paid Sick Leave law previously, and have outlined the situations under which it must be provided to employees.  Like New York City’s paid sick leave entitlements, the law applies to absences related to an employee’s status as a victim of domestic violence, family offense, sexual offense, stalking, or human trafficking.  For a complete list of reasons and more detail about the accrual of sick leave, take a look at our prior blog.

The amount of sick leave to be provided under the legislation and whether the leave is to be paid or unpaid depends on the number of employees and the employer’s net income.  For employers

  • with four or fewer employees and net income less than $1,000,000 in the previous tax year, each employee must be provided with up to 40 hours of unpaid sick leave per calendar year.
  • with four or fewer employees and net income greater than $1,000,000 in the previous tax year must provide each employee with up to 40 hours of paid sick leave.
  • with between five and ninety-five employees, each employee must be provided with up to 40 hours of paid sick leave per calendar year.
  • with 100 or more employees, the amount of paid sick leave per employee increases to up to 56 hours.

One area of uncertainty posed by section 196-b concerns the documentation or proof an employee must provide to his or her employer to be entitled to sick leave.  Subsection 4.a. states that an employee merely has to submit an “oral or written request” for leave.  Likewise, subsection 5.a. of the legislation states that “[a]n employer may not require the disclosure of confidential information … as a condition of providing sick leave pursuant to this section.”  This prohibition on the mandatory disclosure of confidential information likely precludes an employer from requiring that an employee provide a doctor’s note with any substantive detail or other medical information that could be deemed confidential.  Arguably, an employer could request (but not require) than an employee provide such a doctor’s note, but the extent to which an employer can require documentation will likely be addressed in forthcoming regulations.

To date, the New York State Department of Labor (“NYS DOL”) has not issued any regulations or guidance on section 196-b.  Thus, it remains to be seen whether the NYS DOL will provide any clarification concerning exactly what documentation or information  employees must provide to employers in support of a sick leave request under the legislation.  We will continue to monitor the NYS DOL for any developments, including for the issuance of relevant regulations or guidance.

As always, Murtha Cullina’s Labor and Employment Group is available to discuss your specific situation and guide you through the ever-changing landscape of employee leave entitlements.

 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Salvatore G. Gangemi Salvatore G. Gangemi

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction…

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction, retail and service firms; and emerging companies, seek Sal’s legal counsel to navigate today’s complex local, state and federal employment laws. His practice includes resolving disputes; advocating in courts and before administrative agencies; counseling on employment-related issues arising from acquisitions; and guiding clients in both long-range strategy and day-to-day administration of their workplaces and employees.

At the federal level, Sal brings extensive experience in OSHA investigations, audits and proceedings; the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); Title VII discrimination matters; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). He is also well-versed in state and local employment regulations.

Sal regularly represents clients in matters before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Department of Labor and other federal agencies. On the state level, he appears before the New York State Division of Human Rights; the New York City Commission on Human Rights; the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities; the Connecticut Department of Labor; and the New York State Department of Labor. He has litigated cases involving misappropriation of trade secrets, restrictive covenants, breach of employment contract, fiduciary duty and other work-related common law claims.

Clients rely on Sal’s advice on routine human resources matters that arise in their businesses, including requests for reasonable accommodation for those with disabilities, family and medical leave issues, hiring and termination, and wage and hour concerns. Known for his proactive approach to identifying issues before they escalate, he conducts compliance training on sexual harassment prevention and other topics, performs worker classification practice and policy audits, and drafts employment policies and agreements. Sal shares his knowledge of the ever-evolving employment law landscape by speaking at events, conducting continuing legal education seminars and writing articles for a variety of publications.