On May 5, 2021, Governor Cuomo signed into law the Health and Essential Rights Act (HERO Act), which imposes on all non-public employers significant health and safety standards intended to address the spread of airborne infectious diseases, like COVID-19, in the workplace.  The HERO act is touted as the “first-in-the-nation” statute of its kind, apart from the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act), which until now has governed applicable workplace safety standards.  It is not clear to what extent the HERO Act would be superseded by the OSH Act, but for now employers must ensure that they comply with its mandates.

Timeline

Section 1 of the HERO Act takes effect on June 4, 2021, and requires the New York Department of Labor to collaborate with the New York Department of Health, to prepare model airborne exposure prevention standards specific to each industry.  Employers are required to either adopt the model standards developed by the State or prepare their own which equal or exceed the State standards.

Section 2 of the HERO Act takes effect on November 2, 2021, and requires employers with ten or more employee to create a “Workplace Safety Committee,” composed of employee and employer representatives, at least two-thirds of whom must be non-supervisory employees.  Such committees are to be co-chaired by a representative of the employer and non-supervisory employees.  If a collective bargaining agreement exists, the collective bargaining representative is responsible for selecting the employees, who will serve on the committee.

Health and Safety Standards

Section 1 of the HERO Act requires the model standard to address, at a minimum, the following:

  • Employee health screenings;
  • Face coverings;
  • Required personal protective equipment (“PPE”), which shall be provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition at the expense of the employer;
  • Handwashing hygiene stations and adequate break times for workers to use handwashing facilities as needed;
  • Regular cleaning and disinfecting of shared equipment and frequently touched surfaces such as workstations, touchscreens, telephones, handrails, and doorknobs, and all surfaces and washable items in other high-risk areas such as restrooms, dining areas/breakrooms, locker rooms, vehicles and sleeping quarters;
  • Effective social distancing for employees and consumers or customers, as the risk of illness may warrant, including options for social distancing such as sign postage or markers; increasing physical space between workers at the worksite; limiting capacity of customers or consumers; delivering services remotely or through curbside pick-up; reconfiguring spaces where workers congregate; flexible meeting and travel options; flexible worksites; or implementing flexible work hours such as staggered shifts;
  • Compliance with orders of isolation or quarantine that have been issued to employees;
  • Compliance with applicable engineering controls such as proper air flow, exhaust ventilation, or other special design requirements;
  • Designation of one or more supervisory employees to enforce compliance with the airborne infectious disease exposure prevention plan and any other federal, state, or local guidance related to avoidance of spreading an airborne infectious disease as applicable to employees and third parties such as customers, contractors, and members of the public within the workplace;
  • Compliance with any applicable laws, rules, regulations, standards, or guidance on notification to employees and relevant state and local agencies of potential exposure to airborne infectious disease at the work site; and
  • Verbal review of infectious disease standard, employer policies and employee rights under this section.

Enforcement and Private Right of Action

The HERO Act creates a private right of action, allowing employees to sue their employers for not complying with the safety standard, which “creates a substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a condition which exists.”  A prevailing plaintiff can be awarded up to $20,000 in damages plus attorneys’ fees.  The HERO Act also provides anti-retaliation protections for employees who exercise their rights under the law, report violations, report an airborne infectious disease exposure concern, and refuse to work where the employee reasonably believes, in good faith, that working poses an unreasonable risk of exposure to an airborne infectious disease based on existing working conditions.

What Now?

Employers must be prepared to adopt the HERO Act’s safety standards by either adopting the model plan (which has not yet been published) or their own plan that meets or exceeds the requirements of the model plan.  Before June 4th, the State should issue additional guidance as well as the model plan.  In the meantime, we will continue to keep you informed.  Murtha Cullina’s Labor and Employment team is prepared to provide guidance on these and related developments.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Salvatore G. Gangemi Salvatore G. Gangemi

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction…

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction, retail and service firms; and emerging companies, seek Sal’s legal counsel to navigate today’s complex local, state and federal employment laws. His practice includes resolving disputes; advocating in courts and before administrative agencies; counseling on employment-related issues arising from acquisitions; and guiding clients in both long-range strategy and day-to-day administration of their workplaces and employees.

At the federal level, Sal brings extensive experience in OSHA investigations, audits and proceedings; the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); Title VII discrimination matters; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). He is also well-versed in state and local employment regulations.

Sal regularly represents clients in matters before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Department of Labor and other federal agencies. On the state level, he appears before the New York State Division of Human Rights; the New York City Commission on Human Rights; the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities; the Connecticut Department of Labor; and the New York State Department of Labor. He has litigated cases involving misappropriation of trade secrets, restrictive covenants, breach of employment contract, fiduciary duty and other work-related common law claims.

Clients rely on Sal’s advice on routine human resources matters that arise in their businesses, including requests for reasonable accommodation for those with disabilities, family and medical leave issues, hiring and termination, and wage and hour concerns. Known for his proactive approach to identifying issues before they escalate, he conducts compliance training on sexual harassment prevention and other topics, performs worker classification practice and policy audits, and drafts employment policies and agreements. Sal shares his knowledge of the ever-evolving employment law landscape by speaking at events, conducting continuing legal education seminars and writing articles for a variety of publications.