On November 4, 2021, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor (“OSHA”), issued its long-awaited Emergency Temporary Standard (“ETS”), applicable to employers with at least 100 employees.  The ETS was issued by OSHA pursuant to President Biden’s COVID-19 Action Plan, announced last month, and provides minimum requirements in the implementation of mandatory vaccination policies.  The 490 page ETS is effective immediately, and preempts or supersedes any state or municipal law that conflicts with its requirements.

Following is  our take on some of the ETS’s material requirements:

A. Effect of ETS on State Laws

The ETS supersedes any state or municipal requirement that relates to occupational safety and health issues of (i) vaccination, (ii) face coverings, and (iii) COVID-19 testing, except under a state plan that is submitted to and approved by OSHA (“State Plan”).  The ETS invalidates any state or local laws that ban or limit an employer’s authority to require vaccination, face coverings, or COVID-19 testing.  The ETS does not supersede state and local requirements that apply generally to the public health.  For example, state or local laws that require vaccination or recent testing to enter public spaces remain in effect because such laws apply to “workers and nonworkers” alike.

B. Counting Employees for Purposes of the 100-Employee Threshold

The ETS applies to employers, who employ at least 100 employees at any point during the time that the ETS is in effect.  All full-time and part-time employees are counted, including employees, who work remotely.  Remote workers working from home are counted, but are not required to be vaccinated and/or tested on a regular basis, provided that the ETS applies to them if they come to the workplace.

C. ETS’s Application to Healthcare Settings

The ETS does not apply to employees in settings that are already covered by a previously-issued Healthcare ETS, which provides similar, but not identical requirements.

D. Mandatory Vaccination of Employees

The ETS requires employers to develop, implement, and enforce a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy, but permits employers to allow employees who are not fully vaccinated to elect to submit to weekly COVID-19 testing and wear a facemask at work.  The ETS does not require employers to afford employees with a testing option.  Employers that choose instead to mandate vaccination as a term or condition of employment are in compliance with the ETS.

The ETS requires employers to support vaccination by providing employees reasonable time, including up to four hours of paid time, to receive each vaccination dose during work hours, plus reasonable time and paid sick leave to recover from the vaccination side effects. An employee may use the employer’s paid sick leave benefits otherwise available for time off recovering from vaccination side effects, but not for time spent getting vaccinated.

E. Reasonable Accommodations

The ETS does not authorize employers to avoid their obligations to provide reasonable accommodations for medical contraindications or sincerely-held religious beliefs.  All unvaccinated employees, regardless of whether they are unvaccinated for medical or religious reasons, are required to be tested, unless the testing likewise conflicts with the employee’s medical condition or sincerely-held religious beliefs.

F. Recordkeeping for COVID-19 Test Results

Employers are required to maintain copies of test results provided by employees under the ETS.  Such records must be maintained and preserved while the ETS is in effect.

G. Costs of Testing

The ETS does not require employers to pay for COVID-19 testing, although state and local laws or collective bargaining agreements may require employers to pay.

H. Face Coverings

The ETS defines a “face covering” and mandates employers, that permit testing in lieu of vaccination, to require that unvaccinated employees wear face coverings in the workplace.

I. Reporting COVID-19 Fatalities and Hospitalizations

Employers are required to report work-related COVID-19 fatalities and in-patient hospitalizations to OSHA.  The ETS provides standards for determining whether such a fatality or hospitalization is work-related.

J. Informing Employees about the ETS

The ETS requires employers to provide employees (i) information about the ETS and the employer’s required mandatory vaccination policies, (ii) copies of the CDC’s “Key Things to Know About COVID 19 Vaccinations”, and (iii) information about retaliation and discrimination; and (iv) information about laws that impose criminal penalties for knowingly providing false statements or documentation under the ETS.

K. Compliance Date Deadlines

The ETS is effective on November 5, 2021.  All unvaccinated employees must begin wearing masks by December 5, 2021.  Employees must complete the vaccination process within 60 days, by no later than January 4, 2022.  COVID-19 testing is not required until after January 4, 2022.

OSHA expects that the ETS will remain in effect for six months, but may be modified or extended depending on the pandemic.

The ETS requires covered employers to take immediate action to comply with its requirements.  Many employers already have mandatory vaccination policies in place, but are still required to review those policies to ensure that they comply with the ETS.  Although modifications to the ETS are likely, we will continue to keep you informed of such developments.  Murtha’s Labor and Employment group is prepared to provide guidance on these and related issues.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Salvatore G. Gangemi Salvatore G. Gangemi

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction…

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction, retail and service firms; and emerging companies, seek Sal’s legal counsel to navigate today’s complex local, state and federal employment laws. His practice includes resolving disputes; advocating in courts and before administrative agencies; counseling on employment-related issues arising from acquisitions; and guiding clients in both long-range strategy and day-to-day administration of their workplaces and employees.

At the federal level, Sal brings extensive experience in OSHA investigations, audits and proceedings; the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); Title VII discrimination matters; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). He is also well-versed in state and local employment regulations.

Sal regularly represents clients in matters before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Department of Labor and other federal agencies. On the state level, he appears before the New York State Division of Human Rights; the New York City Commission on Human Rights; the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities; the Connecticut Department of Labor; and the New York State Department of Labor. He has litigated cases involving misappropriation of trade secrets, restrictive covenants, breach of employment contract, fiduciary duty and other work-related common law claims.

Clients rely on Sal’s advice on routine human resources matters that arise in their businesses, including requests for reasonable accommodation for those with disabilities, family and medical leave issues, hiring and termination, and wage and hour concerns. Known for his proactive approach to identifying issues before they escalate, he conducts compliance training on sexual harassment prevention and other topics, performs worker classification practice and policy audits, and drafts employment policies and agreements. Sal shares his knowledge of the ever-evolving employment law landscape by speaking at events, conducting continuing legal education seminars and writing articles for a variety of publications.

Photo of Patricia E. Reilly Patricia E. Reilly

Patricia E. Reilly, a partner at Murtha Cullina, serves as chair of  the firm’s Labor & Employment practice and co-chair of the Education practice.

She litigates employment, wage and hour, and restrictive covenant cases in state and federal courts. She also appears before…

Patricia E. Reilly, a partner at Murtha Cullina, serves as chair of  the firm’s Labor & Employment practice and co-chair of the Education practice.

She litigates employment, wage and hour, and restrictive covenant cases in state and federal courts. She also appears before the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, the EEOC, the Connecticut Department of Labor, and the U.S. Department of Labor. Whether resolving a matter pre-litigation or litigating a case to trial, Tricia uses her first-rate strategic litigation skills to advocate for her clients’ interests. She works closely with her clients to ensure that the litigation is executed with the highest degree of skill and professionalism.

In addition to maintaining a thriving litigation practice, Tricia advises clients on a wide range of employment law matters, including sexual harassment and discrimination avoidance; disability and pregnancy accommodation; FMLA; wage and hour compliance; and trade secrets and restrictive covenants. She also provides training and presents on labor and employment issues, particularly sexual harassment prevention.  Tricia represents clients in a wide range of industries and sectors, including education (colleges, universities and independent schools), health care, financial services, retail, food and beverage, transportation services, energy, and manufacturing.

Tricia is listed as a leading Labor and Employment Lawyer in Chambers USA. In addition, she is listed in Best Lawyers in America®. In 2017 and 2020, Best Lawyers in America® recognized her as “Lawyer of the Year” for New Haven, Litigation – Labor and Employment, and in 2020 Best Lawyers also recognized her as “Lawyer of the Year” for New Haven Employment Law – Management.  In 2019 and 2020, Super Lawyers listed Tricia among the Top 25 Women Attorneys in Connecticut.