On March 3, 2022, President Biden signed into law the “Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021” (the “Act”).  The Act, which takes effect immediately, amends the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”) by narrowing both its scope and applicability. Specifically, the Act prohibits employers from forcing employees to settle sexual misconduct claims in closed-door arbitration venues.

Before the Act, many sexual harassment claims were resolved confidentially under pre-dispute arbitration agreements that employees were required to sign as a condition of employment.  Although the Act does not ban arbitration of sexual assault and harassment claims, it prohibits employers from mandating that employees agree to arbitrate such disputes.  The Act also bars pre-dispute joint or class action waivers in connection with sexual assault and harassment claims.  Interestingly, the Act does not just apply to claims of sexual harassment arising under federal law (i.e., Title VII), but it applies to such claims brought under state or tribal law.  As a result, small employers that would not be covered under federal law would still be subject to the Act for claims raised under state law.  The Act is one of many legislative changes arising from the #MeToo movement and is intended to shed light on incidents of sexual misconduct in the workplace.

Now, employees with claims of sexual misconduct may choose to file lawsuits against their employers and alleged perpetrators in a public forum rather than submitting their claims to private arbitration.  Employees asserting sexual assault or sexual harassment claims may bring such claims in court, either as an individual or part of a class action.  Employees may still opt to resolve their claims in arbitration but cannot be forced to do so, regardless of whether they previously entered into an arbitration agreement.

This Act has significant impact for employers who rely on arbitration agreements as a tool to efficiently resolve employee disputes, and as protection against high jury verdicts.  While arbitration agreements regarding other types of claims remain enforceable, existing arbitration agreements will not prevent employees from bringing forth claims of sexual misconduct in court.  Accordingly, employers should review and revise any mandatory arbitration provisions in their employment-related agreements.  This includes employee handbooks, offer letters, waivers and contracts.  Murtha Cullina’s Labor & Employment Group is available to assist in addressing questions regarding these and other issues.

 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Patricia E. Reilly Patricia E. Reilly

Patricia E. Reilly, a partner at Murtha Cullina, serves as chair of  the firm’s Labor & Employment practice and co-chair of the Education practice.

She litigates employment, wage and hour, and restrictive covenant cases in state and federal courts. She also appears before…

Patricia E. Reilly, a partner at Murtha Cullina, serves as chair of  the firm’s Labor & Employment practice and co-chair of the Education practice.

She litigates employment, wage and hour, and restrictive covenant cases in state and federal courts. She also appears before the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, the EEOC, the Connecticut Department of Labor, and the U.S. Department of Labor. Whether resolving a matter pre-litigation or litigating a case to trial, Tricia uses her first-rate strategic litigation skills to advocate for her clients’ interests. She works closely with her clients to ensure that the litigation is executed with the highest degree of skill and professionalism.

In addition to maintaining a thriving litigation practice, Tricia advises clients on a wide range of employment law matters, including sexual harassment and discrimination avoidance; disability and pregnancy accommodation; FMLA; wage and hour compliance; and trade secrets and restrictive covenants. She also provides training and presents on labor and employment issues, particularly sexual harassment prevention.  Tricia represents clients in a wide range of industries and sectors, including education (colleges, universities and independent schools), health care, financial services, retail, food and beverage, transportation services, energy, and manufacturing.

Tricia is listed as a leading Labor and Employment Lawyer in Chambers USA. In addition, she is listed in Best Lawyers in America®. In 2017 and 2020, Best Lawyers in America® recognized her as “Lawyer of the Year” for New Haven, Litigation – Labor and Employment, and in 2020 Best Lawyers also recognized her as “Lawyer of the Year” for New Haven Employment Law – Management.  In 2019 and 2020, Super Lawyers listed Tricia among the Top 25 Women Attorneys in Connecticut.

Photo of Salvatore G. Gangemi Salvatore G. Gangemi

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction…

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction, retail and service firms; and emerging companies, seek Sal’s legal counsel to navigate today’s complex local, state and federal employment laws. His practice includes resolving disputes; advocating in courts and before administrative agencies; counseling on employment-related issues arising from acquisitions; and guiding clients in both long-range strategy and day-to-day administration of their workplaces and employees.

At the federal level, Sal brings extensive experience in OSHA investigations, audits and proceedings; the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); Title VII discrimination matters; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). He is also well-versed in state and local employment regulations.

Sal regularly represents clients in matters before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Department of Labor and other federal agencies. On the state level, he appears before the New York State Division of Human Rights; the New York City Commission on Human Rights; the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities; the Connecticut Department of Labor; and the New York State Department of Labor. He has litigated cases involving misappropriation of trade secrets, restrictive covenants, breach of employment contract, fiduciary duty and other work-related common law claims.

Clients rely on Sal’s advice on routine human resources matters that arise in their businesses, including requests for reasonable accommodation for those with disabilities, family and medical leave issues, hiring and termination, and wage and hour concerns. Known for his proactive approach to identifying issues before they escalate, he conducts compliance training on sexual harassment prevention and other topics, performs worker classification practice and policy audits, and drafts employment policies and agreements. Sal shares his knowledge of the ever-evolving employment law landscape by speaking at events, conducting continuing legal education seminars and writing articles for a variety of publications.